The Obligatory Post-Super Bowl Post
Monday, February 8, 2010 at 6:36PM

Here we are again. Another Monday following another Sunday with a major pop culture event. Raise your hand if you watched the Super Bowl last night. If your hand is up, you are part of the 35.03% of Americans who set a new television-watching record.
The 2010 Super Bowl garnered 106.5 million viewers, which set a new record for most viewers for a single television program. With 500,000 more viewers, it surpassed the series finale of M*A*S*H, which had held the record since 1983, though with the increased number of television sets in homes, its actually a lower percentage.
But with 35.03% of Americans tuning in to the Super Bowl, there were roughly 51.7% of American office employees talking about the Saints' gutsy onside kick, Peyton Manning's late game interception and the incredible amount of money GoDaddy.com wasted.
With this conti
nued interest in the sporting event and the hoopla surrounding it, it's no wonder than CBS can continue to rake in $2.5 - 3 million per 30-second spot. But is it worth it? For a major brand, is shelling out the cash for enough spots to make a splash really going to help the bottom line?
That's the question Pepsi poses as it chose to forgo Super Bowl ads this year and instead direct funding toward its Refresh Project, a crowd-sourced philanthropic endeavor to give away grants to worthy causes. And while the majority of this morning's water cooler conversations might not have included Pepsi, some did, whereas shelling out the cash for Super Bowl ads might not have made Pepsi a Twitter trending topic anyway.
What shall be interesting to watch is whether other major brands, with solid marketshare, reputation, brand recognition and loyalty choose to follow suit. If these brands pull out of the Super Bowl and opt for a more long-burning activity than this flash in the pan, that will shape the way viewers, networks and advertisers approach the game.
If major brands pull out, smaller brands and start-ups (who need an initial
splash of name recognition) can get in...if they can afford it. If fewer brands can afford to buy spots, networks will have to drop the ad price, which opens up a whole new demographic of companies to the possibility of Super Bowl advertisement. But will these companies still be shelling out for production value? Will we see a decline in interest in the commercials and people return to timing their "pit stops" during commercials? Have Super Bowl ads "jumped the shark"?
Katie Page |
3 Comments |
NFL,
commercials,
pepsi,
peyton manning,
super bowl,
tv in
Pop Culture,
Sports 


